Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts
Sunday, April 9, 2017
Thoughts on Pete's Dragon (2016)
Pete's Dragon (2016) is a decent remake. It is different enough to be enjoyable and considered it's own movie. It at times feels like an alternate universe version of Mama. Still, it has heart and is an entertaining movie.
Sunday, September 25, 2016
The Magnificent Seven (2016) – review
The story of The
Magnificent Seven is nothing new. After Akira Kurosawa made The Seven Samurai there came the 1960 American
film of The Magnificent Seven. In the
years that followed there were many movies that copied the basic premise of a
band of heroes coming together to face overwhelming odds to protect an
oppressed group. Movies like: The Three
Amigos, Blazing Saddles, and A Bug’s Life are just a few examples
that come to mind. With great acting and a quality director The Magnificent Seven was ready for a
remake.
A small Western town is under the threat of an evil
industrialist, played by Peter Sarsgaard. After he threatens the small farming
community a couple of survivors go out in search for some champions to drive
off this threat. Seven misfit gunfighters band together to help the farmers. In
doing so they teach the farmers how to defend themselves and fight off the
opposition.
The acting is great. Ethan Hawk, Denzel Washington, Chris
Pratt, and many of the other actors truly encompass the variety of the old
West. Haley Bennett, who plays one of the farmers from the small town, is
especially sympathetic and impressive to watch. Peter Sarsgaard is a fun
villain that captures a lot of the same craziness that made Gary Oldman so
entertaining in Leon: The Professional.
His motivation makes him seem more like a serious version of Hedley Lamarr from
Blazing Saddles. As entertaining as
his character is, he is not as pitiable as the Eli Wallach performance in the
1960 film.
The story is unique in its own way and keeps the general
theme of the original for the most part. It skips much of the exploration into
the concept of altruism; however, it does delve deeper into the idea of
vengeance. The photography shows great skill as the audience is treated to
amazing sunset shots. The director also built a lot of tension up to the big
battle. My only complaints are fairly nitpicky. For example: the characters run
the gamut of races and that seemed fairly unrealistic. Having a Native American,
a Chinese man, a black man, and a Mexican made things seem a bit too modern
since the film takes place in 1879. Given the United States history it is
fairly difficult to imagine a group this progressive. The other thing is that
the town is said to be full of simple farmers, yet there is not a single farm
to be seen in the entire film. Not a big deal, just sort of odd.
The Magnificent Seven
is a worthy remake of a classic story. The changes give it charm and the
characters are brought to life in such a way that it will entertain any fan of
the Western genre. The film is well made and the performances are solid. If you
have any desire to see it catch it as a matinee or a rental. While not a perfect film it captures the
themes of the originals and alters exactly what is needed to make it something
unique.
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Ghostbusters (2016) – review
The idea of a reboot of Ghostbusters
did not thrill me. When I saw the
commercial it looked gimmicky and screamed “cash-grab.” Still, I went in hoping
for the best from this movie that stared a group of funny women and headed by a
competent comedic director. The movie is
okay but flawed. There are some funny moments that make the film likable but
they are marred by an underwhelming story and poorly written characters.
Dr. Erin Gilbert, played by Kristin Wiig, is a physics
teacher attempting to gain tenure. A former book she published with Dr. Abby
Yates, played by Melissa McCarthy, is causing problems with her credibility.
When Gilbert confronts Yates they team up with engineer Holtzmann, played by
Kate McKinnon, to investigate a haunted mansion. Upon discovery of the ghost,
they work to trap the spiritual entities. Patty Tolan, played by Leslie Jones,
an MTA worker that has witnessed the paranormal first hand, eventually joins
them. Together they must face an evil
nerd who wants to create an undead apocalypse.
In the original film, the Ghostbusters had quirky
personality types that play well against a world that plays it straight through
the film. In the Paul Feig Ghostbusters
world everybody is quirky so the main characters need to be VERY quirky. This
aspect comes off a bit annoying. The character of Holtzmann was painful to
watch. This was disappointing since McKinnon is amazing on SNL. The secretary Kevin,
played by Chris Hemsworth, is hunky and over-the-top stupid. Considering that Ghostbusters has a very strong girl
power message it felt out of place by having Erin drool over the pretty but
incompetent secretary.
The acting was enjoyable. Abby and Erin do their parts well
but the character of Patty was surprisingly good. She was upbeat and the
character was not too intense. The evil nerd that causes all the spiritual
mischief is amusing as well, though his motivation was a bit trite. He is
basically evil because he was picked on. The idea of a vexed, angry geek is a
lot less threating than a Babylonian god. There are many cameos, which
sometimes work well and fit into the plot and other times take you out of the
movie by knocking you on the head as if saying “Remember Ghostbusters!”
As a whole this version of Ghostbusters is okay. It might be worth a rental if you are really
curious. It is not nearly the caliber of the original. It feels a lot more like
an SNL sketch that was stretched for time. It has moments that make it
enjoyable but it still comes off as a gimmicky as a concept as Blues Brothers 2000. If the mood “meh” had a face it might look
like the reboot of Ghostbusters.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)